read the dissent. Also realize that you can only appeal on *procedural* grounds.
Dana On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 13:16:44 -0400, Jochem van Dieten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dana wrote: > > > > I believe that there are civil rights claims being made on both sides > > of this case and therefore it should have been reviewed starting with > > facts. What happened was another procedural review. > > "Notwithstanding these findings, it is essential that Plaintiffs establish a > substantial likelihood of success on the merits, which the court finds they > have not done. . . ." > > That is not a procedural review. > > Jochem > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:151406 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
