I don't see how that constitutes an "activist judge". He made a decision in accordance with the law, he stuck by it.
Additionally, why was this evidence that she was not PVS not submitted in this first place? - Matt Small -----Original Message----- From: Sam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 2:03 PM To: CF-Community Subject: Re: 2 Branches of Gov't Enough. The Judge ruled Terri was PSV and Michael was legal guardian. All subsequent cases were based on whether Michael Shiavo was legal guardian and of course he was. But they couldn't appeal the PVS ruling so they went after the guardian one. That's where the problem was, once the judge ruled she was PSV nothing could be done. Congress wanted the Judge to reevaluate the case ignoring the PVS ruling based on new evidence but he refused. Technically he was allowed to, but that's were the rules need to be fixed. By one Judge deciding she was PVS, the day after a few donations, there's nothing the entire country could do about it. On Apr 7, 2005 10:27 AM, Matthew Small wrote: > To cut this short, there is really no such thing as an "activist judge". In order to limit the power of a judge, one must simply create a law which specifically states a purpose (example: "Homosexual marriage is prohibited.") and that cannot be superseded by an interpretation of a higher law. > > - Matt Small ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:153073 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
