> Nick wrote: > The law should never give that ability to somebody in the first place. I > believe in guardians, however with the absence of a formal written document, > anything an individual might say is simply hearsay, and even if it is the > guardian, it should not be used. >
Do you mean you think the guardian shouldn't decide in matters of life or death, but rather only smaller matters? If so, I guess my position is that my wife speaks for me in all matters if I'm unavailable. To me, that's what marriage legally is. For example I have a cousin whose husband turned out to be a gambleaholic - she was responsible for the debts even though they were racked up without her written permission. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:153306 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
