you seem happy enough to ignore numbers that don't fit your theory. Dana
On 4/14/05, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sam wrote: > > Interesting that you ask me for a cite and not Gruss. Accuse me of > > pulling numbers out of the air. > > > > The accuracy of the numbers isn't my point so there's no need to back > them up. What are you comfortable with: 1 in 3, 1 in 5, 1 in 7? It > doesn't matter. > > The point is, whatever the number is, it can used to calculate > someone's likelihood of being part of some profile. If your profile > doesn't include any type of quantitative analysis then it's not a > profile. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:154054 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
