what is the reliability and validity of those checklists. How about
the predictive validity? From what I understand its pretty low. Too
low to be used in a clinical situation.

larry

On 4/15/05, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> this is the explanation I was looking for of the rationale for the
> denial of DCF intervention. Apparently the law governing the agency
> does not require intervention if there is a guardian. What is
> overlooked to my mind is the case where it's the guardian who is
> accused of abuse and the judge who is accused of allowing it. So
> essentially the ruling is that the law says she cannot be removed from
> the custody of her guardian, who is alleged to be abusing her, because
> she has a guardian. Doh. Imho there is a need here for improved
> legislation.
> 
> As for your comments, this is NOT the DCF spokesperson's testimony,
> which the judge does not appear to have taken very seriously. But
> these are not paperwork violations. Failing to repair the wheelchair,
> which you conveniently did not mention, meant that she had to stay in
> bed all of the time, increasing a risk of bedsores and other
> unnecessary complications.
> 
> A bit slow in filing bureaucratic paperwork! he was years and years
> behind in filing the reports summarizing how what he was doing what is
> her best interests. Years. The judge was allowing this because she was
> scheduled to die anyway.
> 
> The failure to provide legal representation was not a matter of paying
> legal bills. It's the decision that directly led, in my opinion, to
> this decision that she'd be better off dead.
> 
> The failure to provide therapy directly affected the quality of every
> day of her life. If she had recovered the ability to open her hands,
> she would not have needed pads in her hands to be changed etc, just
> for an example. But hey they had already decided that she wasn't going
> to get better and she'd be dying soon anyway.
> 
> Thus it was ok in their view to put her in a hospice facility designed
> for the dying even though she was not in any way shape or form
> terminal and the hospice was not equipped to provide medical care.
> 
> There are other allegations I have seen mentioned, such as refusing to
> allow the blinds in her room to be opened ever, which are not
> addressed here. I am not sure if that is because they were found to be
> trivial or found to be unfounded.
> 
> Whether she was abused in the hospice is a separate issue from whether
> the marriage was originally abusive.
> 
> As for your dismissive comments on the checklist... Gruss asked for
> the bullets and I gave him the bullets. It's written for a general
> audience of possibly abused spouses. There's plenty of studies out
> there, and I have posted some of  them.
> 
> Frankly this conversation reminds me of the adage about none being so
> blind as those who will not see.
> 
> Dana
> 
> On 4/14/05, Larry C. Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Those instances of abuse are according to the court decision include
> > (this is from page 3 of
> > http://abstractappeal.com/schiavo/trialctorder031005.pdf)
> >
> > failure to provide independent legal counsel,
> > failur to provide timely guardian plans,
> > failure to provide therapy in the hospice setting.
> > paying for legal fees.
> > The nastiest thing they could come up with is failure to move her arms
> > once in a while.
> >
> > The DCF petition also discusses other allegations that have been made
> > but were unfounded and the case involving these allegations was
> > closed.
> >
> > Some abuse. Failure to move her arms. Paying legal bills. Being a bit
> > slow in filing bureaucratic paperwork. You got it Terri Shiavo was
> > really abused here. Another big case of the Burning Bed. The horrors
> > of paying a legal bill. That just resonates throughout history along
> > side the torture and massacre of thousands. We'll be though of as
> > complete barbarians because Michael Shiavo didn't move her wrists 3
> > times a day. Hey I bet you could also accuse him of not killing
> > himself in remorse as other evidence of abuse. After all he fits the
> > profile. What the heck those magazine quizzes are certainly accurate,
> > almost as good as a Crackerjack secret decoder ring.
> >
> > It seems to me that the DFA  and the Schindlers were really
> > stretching it with this set of accusations. If this is the rock solid
> > evidence of abuse you keep talking about, then you've lost all
> > credibility in this matter.
> >
> > On 4/14/05, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Matthew
> > >
> > > http://abstractappeal.com/schiavo/DCFpetition.pdf for the document
> > > filed in court
> > >
> > > The main page, http://abstractappeal.com/schiavo/infopage.html is an
> > > excellent summary of the legal proceedings. The author mostly confines
> > > himself to the legal issues in the case, though I seem to recall
> > > reading comments from him that said he was mildly of the opinion that
> > > dying was in her best interest. But there is a lot of consensus out
> > > there that this si an authoritative site as to testimony and
> > > timelines.
> > >
> > > The document refers to 30 specific and detailed allegations that they
> > > wanted to investigate, as well as to a number of others that were
> > > closed as unfounded. The 89 number may well have come from testimony
> > > and referred to number of calls or... who knows.
> > >
> > > Hope that helps
> > > Dana
> > >
> > > On 4/14/05, Matthew Small <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Hey Sam - That article was written by the editor of LifeNews.com - and 
> > > > I'm
> > > > just not sure that it's an unbiased, reputable news organization. Are 
> > > > there
> > > > any other sources?
> > > >
> > > > - Matt Small
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Sam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2005 2:47 PM
> > > > To: CF-Community
> > > > Subject: Re: Gruss - Schiavo question
> > > >
> > > > Let me remind you what I said:
> > > > "The Department of Children and Families had received 89 allegations of
> > > > abuse and neglect in the years leading up to Terri's starvation death."
> > > >
> > > > I would list the abuses but Judge Greer has ordered them kept secret.
> > > > I don't know where the original press release is but here's a copy I
> > > > found from google. :)
> > > > http://fuckfrance.com/read.html?postid=1169832&replies=31&page=1
> > > >
> > > > A local judge refused to open the records of a Florida agency that is
> > > > looking into allegations of abuse and neglect against Terri Schiavo by
> > > > her estranged husband Michael. Florida media outlets had wanted copies
> > > > of previous investigations in the case.
> > > > ......
> > > >
> > > > On 4/14/05, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
> > > > > You claimed 78 instances of abuse. Well where are they from? Provide a
> > > > > citation or do we just assume that you're pulling them out of your
> > > > > imagination.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> 
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support 
efficiency by 100%
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:154218
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to