> Matthew wrote:
> Wow, you really know how to demonize somebody for not agreeing with you.

I don't mean to demonize you, just your ideas of federal authority. 
I'm trying to extrapolate your argument so that you can see how
dangerous it is.  There's a reason that we have local government.

For example, how is your idea of "keeping the family intact" different
from, say, Taliban laws subjugating women?  Both are an attempt by a
central authority to moralize to it's citizens; to control their
behavior to "protect" them.

I'll repeat what Justice Thomas said in his dissent yesterday: "If the
majority is to be taken seriously, the Federal Government may now
regulate quilting bees, clothes drives, and potluck suppers throughout
the 50 states. This makes a mockery of Madison's assurance to the the
people of New York that the 'powers delegated' to the Federal
Government are 'few and defined' while those of the States are
'numerous and indefinite.'"

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble 
Ticket application

http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:159910
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to