We went through this at length a while back, but I think that the
liberty of the person who is not emitting toxic gases should override
that of the person who is, in cases where the two conflict.

Dana

On 6/9/05, Steven Brownlee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You get the point.  With freedom comes problems because not everyone is as
> honest, polite, or thoughtful as you.  But that's the price.
> > Your choice is to accept it or move to, say, North Korea where you've got
> a moralizer in office to make protective decisions for you.
> 
> Unfortunately, many people feel that their personal freedom is paramount and
> that the liberty of others is not as important.  It's a very selfish point
> of view.  If someone else wants to smoke themselves to death, then that's
> their right.  If you do not want to be exposed to 2nd hand smoke, then don't
> stand near that person.  Just as they would move if they felt that you were
> talking too loud.  It's very easy.
> 
> 
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support 
efficiency by 100%
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:160125
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to