just out of curiosity, what's your position on the Patriot Act?

Dana

On 6/9/05, Steven Brownlee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >...I think that the
> >liberty of the person who is not emitting toxic gases should override
> >that of the person who is, in cases where the two conflict.
> 
> There is no such thing as a conflict of liberties, Dana.  Liberty means 
> freedom to do what you wish within the confines of the law.  These cannot 
> conflict until someone crosses that line.  It is legal for someone to take 
> HUGE toke of a cigarette and blow it right by you.  However rude that may be, 
> they have the right to do that and you have  the right to call them nasty 
> names, complain to the restaurant manager, and/or leave the premises (note: 
> the restaurant manager has every right to MAKE them leave, however you do 
> not).
> 
> Your statement is highly dangerous and more toxic to the foundations of the 
> liberty of Americans than a smoker's 2nd hand smoke will ever be.  Be careful 
> what you wish for, because if we lived in your would, we'd soon be saying, 
> "Hello, comrade programmer.  Did you get your toilet paper this month?"
> 
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support 
efficiency by 100%
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:160178
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to