That's it exactly, you cannot have selective rights based on the person. Its the same basic philosophy with the ACLU - you have to protect the rights of everyone, even obnoxious or offensive types like the KKK or neo-Nazis.
larry On 6/27/05, S. Isaac Dealey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Okay that sucks... I understand conceptually that they perceive the > reporters are protecting people who are "in the wrong", but if you > don't let them protect "the bad guys", then "good guys" will never > come to them with important information. > > > The Supreme Court refused to hear the appeal of the two > > reporters, upholding the rulings of lower courts. In other > > words allowing coercive measures, ie., jail time for 18 > > months and longer or massive fines, if the reporters refuse > > to coooperate by revealing their sources: > > > http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/06/27/scotus.reporters.ap/inde > > x.html > > > larry > > > s. isaac dealey 954.522.6080 > new epoch : isn't it time for a change? > > add features without fixtures with > the onTap open source framework > > http://www.fusiontap.com > http://coldfusion.sys-con.com/author/4806Dealey.htm > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:162081 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
