> I think the answer is, though, that if you don't have time > to do the > research, then you don't invest in it. You said > "obligatory", but it > would not be. I know Kevin is saying that you lose the > money, but I do > not believe that is true (still waiting for the proof, he > may be > right!). So if you don't have the intelligence or the time > - stay out > of it. I don't need the government to restrict me because > some people > aren't smart enough to be trusted with their own money.
I would agree with that... I don't know if it would be obligatory -- but I do understand the concern. Assuming people can opt to continue on with the previous system (or similar) then I have no objection to them allowing people to specify that they'd like their SS withholdings invested in a particular set of funds. It's more book-keeping for the administration, so of course I expect they would need to factor that in to some percentage they keep to pay for the overhead. s. isaac dealey 954.522.6080 new epoch : isn't it time for a change? add features without fixtures with the onTap open source framework http://www.fusiontap.com http://coldfusion.sys-con.com/author/4806Dealey.htm ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:164786 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
