> Nick wrote: > But neither claim to be the source of the leak, only that they were asked. >
That's true ... Since the CIA doesn't and didn't want this information public, I guess we could say that no matter how the leak occurred, something dirty happened: 1.) The President, for whatever reason, authorized the leak thus endangering national security - at least from the CIA's point of view. In this case the President is in deep do-do. 2.) Someone else, unauthorized by the President, broke SF312 and leaked the data. In that case that person should, at a minimum, have their security clearences revoked. I would also think the President would like to have a word with them about leaking unauthorized data to the press. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:165524 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
