Your analogy is all wrong. It's more like this. You and your neighbors lived in shacks in the woods and some Native Americans offered to buy the land your shacks were on. Some people sold and left while others waited. Then the government said leave and we'll kill all the Native Americans in these woods and when they're all dead you can have your land back. But the Native Americans win and build big cities. Now you still want your land back and you don't want to live amongst the Native Americans.
On 8/15/05, Gruss Gott wrote: > The best way to consider this is to think of where your house is > located and which Native American tribe called that their hunting > ground. The question is, do those Native Americans have a legitimate > claim on your house and land? Or how about those before them? > > Unfortunately the answer to that question is: it depends on how big > their gun is. There is no one right moral answer. > > In this case you've got 2 armed groups that claim the same land and > can make a case for it. The right answer for America is to take the > neutral position and help negotiate a peaceful agreement. > > Supporting one side or another has been proven to fail. > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Purchase Studio MX with Flash Pro from House of Fusion, a Macromedia Authorized Affiliate and support the CF community. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=51 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:169384 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
