You're dancing again :) How do you remain neutral when one side uses children as suicide bombers? When that side will accept nothing but total death of the side?
On 8/15/05, Gruss Gott wrote: > > Sam wrote: > > Your analogy is all wrong. > > Then you don't understand it. Here are the salient points: > > 1.) A contract is only as good as the parties that sign it. > 2.) In the case of an ownership dispute, possession is 9/10ths of the law. > 3.) The biggest gun wins. > > In this case you've got disputed land being fought over by equally > matched, militarized parties. Both call the other's military forces > terrorists and any discussion quickly devolves into justifying murder > based on "self" defense. > > The correct answer is that there is no one right moral answer except > for these 2 parties to arrange a peaceful settlement. From an > American point of view we should be a neutral party seeking to > accomplish that, but for years we haven't been. > > So, we should take an honest position. Either: > > 1.) Declare and ACT neutrally, or > 2.) Take a side and fight to win. > > Currently the US position is officially neutral and unofficially with > Israel. That 's stupid. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how to get a fax number that sends and receives faxes using your current email address http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=64 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:169391 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
