> Sam wrote: > Turn it around just to see how silly it sounds. > Your argument does indeed sound silly. Hussein (I wasn't aware you're on a first name basis with him) deserves no support, but that doesn't imply invasion. There are many countries that the US does not support, but that doesn't mean we're invading them either.
So the question remains - if you agree with invading any country that doesn't pose a clear and present danger to the US then you are a chickenhawk. Since it's been discovered that Hussein was not a clear and present danger (i.e., no WMD), continued support for the war is to be a chickenhawk. BTW, all of the nationbuilding BS is right out of Liberal 101 isn't it? You know: "we are the world's policeman" and "the US is responsible for all peoples of the world." ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=17 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:169603 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
