The man should look up the phrase Separate but Equal.

Its the same argument that the segregationists used against blacks.
Just the names are changed.

On 9/9/05, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Sam wrote:
> > Equality is not about titles unless using the title deprives you of
> > something. If civil union license affords the same opportunity as a
> > marriage license where is the deprivation?
> > Why not ban the words men and women from restroom signs? That's
> > segregation?
> >
> 
> When the state deprives any citizen of anything based on an arbitrary
> characteristic, it's discrimnation, period.  Again, White and black
> water fountains, both provide water so what's the complaint?  Which
> brings us to your failed analogy:
> 
> First, I don't think restrooms are part of any legal code and second
> using an opposite sex restroom violates somebody else's right to
> privacy.  I'm sure there's also hundreds of other reason why that
> analogy doesn't work.
> 
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support 
efficiency by 100%
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:173643
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to