retract -- How sleazily evasive of you, Sam. Sorry...
Saying that "separate but equal" applies only to physical things and therefore does not apply to marriage vs. civil-union is avoiding the subject (not to mention patently invalid), because, if a water fountain provides the same water, then the same argument also applies to the black and white water fountains. If it provides the same water, then there is no difference between them except the use of a word (either black or white). > I'm the Man now, coooool! > Separate is a physical limitation. Separate classrooms, > restrooms, > water fountains and back of the bus to name a few. These > are all > physical limitations. What limitation is there on civil > union except > for it's social impact? Nobodies being deprived of > anything except the > use of a word, everything else is equal or should be. > On 9/9/05, Larry C. Lyons wrote: >> The man should look up the phrase Separate but Equal. >> >> Its the same argument that the segregationists used >> against blacks. >> Just the names are changed. s. isaac dealey 954.522.6080 new epoch : isn't it time for a change? add features without fixtures with the onTap open source framework http://www.fusiontap.com http://coldfusion.sys-con.com/author/4806Dealey.htm ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:173669 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
