You mean you aren't? <g> Actually, having seen the varying interpretations
of my comment that it didn't make a difference a few days ago, I see your
point, but, I don't know how to break this to you, um, quoting Rush Limbaugh
counts for more on this than any misinterpretation.

On 9/30/05, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> See, I said "Shhhh! He wasn't appointed by Bush."
> And that turned into "no administration officials had been arrested
> for corruption."
> It's like playing telephone, it's no wonder you all think I'm a
> right-wing-nut.
>
> On 9/30/05, Dana wrote:
> > Ken said you had a point, that no administration official had been
> arrested
> > for corruption. I thought he was kidding.
> >
> > Dana
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble 
Ticket application

http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:175585
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to