but he is saying the article is partisan for mentioning the existence of these scandals. Not commenting on their validity or assuming their truth. Just mentioning heir existence.
Dana On 10/3/05, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Sam wrote: > > There's a charge of conspiracy but no explanation or evidence. > > That's a disingenuous argument - the Republicans have been hit hard by > MULTIPLE corruption scandals: > > * Delay > * Frist > * That acquisition guy > * Katrina (cronyism) > * Valerie Plame > > And then there's more discretionary domestic spending that even Pres. > Johnson not to mention a nation-building boondoggle. > > In a nutshell, things ain't goin' well. You can quibble all you want, > if it makes you feel better, but you'd be deluding yourself. > > Now, will any of these charges amount to anything? Who knows? > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:175713 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
