Or how about the 200+ people in the Reagan Administrator at where investigated, questioned, indited, or arrested for various violations...
At 01:48 PM 12/13/2001 -0500, you wrote: > Trickle-down? The so called trickle down included a big tax cut, >true. I think that the top end was almost 50 percent and Reagan's plan >brought it down to a little under 40 percent. That was good. That tax >cut, as John Kennedy had predicted some 20 years prior, increased >revenue into the Federal coffers. Also, if you go back and look at the >rate of increase of the level of the Dow since it began, you'll notice >something quite striking. Until roughly 1982, the growth rate was >constant, yet slow. Around 1982, the year of this evil tax cut, the rate >of increase of the Dow took a dramatic increase. This is the boom that >Clinton rode through 2 disgusting terms. > > Iran-Contra? What would you have done? > > Star Wars? It's a good idea. The thing about it is is that it >depended on technologies that did not exist. That requires both money >and time. No one wanted to spend the money, and no one wanted to wait >for the solution. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Howie Hamlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 1:32 PM > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: Re: Ouch > > > > > > Ronnie Raygun? > > > > Can you say "trickle-down economics?" > > > > Can you say "Iran-Contra (aka "arms for hostages")?" > > > > Can you say "Star Wars?" > > > > I knew you could... > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
