right Sam. You go on believing that. Dana
On 10/24/05, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Wilson's article was all lies, it was propaganda to hurt the President > and the truth was his wife got him the gig. She wasn't threatened or > inconvenienced in any way. The Russians blew her cover 10 years > earlier > > > On 10/24/05, Dana wrote: > > that's a *very* technical "no crime was committed." If they leaked the > name > > of a CIA agent in order to hurt a government employee who had do nothing > > more than his duty to speak the inconvenient truth, then that is in the > best > > tradition of the Nixon White House, bravo for making corruption a > Republican > > tradition. Regardless of whether it can be proved that they knew at the > time > > that the agent was undercover. How can you defend this stuff? > > > > Next thing you know Cheney will be saying "I am not a crook." > > > > Dana > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:177973 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
