uh... so you are saying that they were not the leakers because McClellan said so ?
On 10/24/05, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The statement Gruss posted claimed they weren't the leakers. > > Q: So you're saying -- you're saying categorically those three > individuals were not the leakers or did not authorize the leaks; is > that what you're saying? > > MR. McCLELLAN: That's correct. I've spoken with them. > > We still don't know if they were the leakers or if they authorized the > leak, yet Gruss claims since I don't have a rosy colored crystal ball > like his, I can't think for myself. > > One more week and we'l know. Patience. > > -sam > > "Whatever it takes them to put their hands back on the government, the > Democrats will do. If it means putting me, DeLay, Bush, Rove, Libby, > whoever they can in jail, they'll do it. They don't care it's the only > way they can." -Rush > > > On 10/24/05, Dana wrote: > > OK Sam, that's amusing, but really, it doesn't refute his point. The > White > > House claimed to know nothing about this. It seems that at a minimum two > > high-level staffers did indeed know something. > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Sams Teach Yourself Regular Expressions in 10 Minutes by Ben Forta http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=40 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:177997 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
