Natural selection would not neccessarily eliminate them. If having homosexuals in a family group helped survival rates, then that gene trend would tend to get passed on.
If having homosexuals in a family group hurt survival rates, then that gene trend would tend to die out. The fact that is has not died out, and is probably genetic in nature, shows that it is either inconclusive or masked by societal factors, useful, or has been too short a time to see any trend. On 11/9/05, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No, I'm saying that natural selection would eliminate them unless they > were bi. These groups may help to raise nieces and nephews but not > pass on genes. > > On 11/9/05, Larry C. Lyons wrote: > > simple you're saying anti-gay bigotry is natural. Therefore those > > groups that practice it are more likely to survive. I'm saying that > > the opposite. Tolerant groups are more likely to survive and > > reproduce. > > > > larry > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Purchase Dreamweaver with Homesite Plus from House of Fusion, a Macromedia Authorized Affiliate and support the CF community. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=54 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:180823 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
