I'm talking about the individuals passing down there traits. I am not saying homosexuals hurt society in anyway.
The Huguenots were a group that lived in New Paltz that didn't believe in having sex at all. They're gone now. Same thing would have happened to gays unless they mix it up. Not saying there won't be new ones... On 11/9/05, Jerry Johnson wrote: > Natural selection would not neccessarily eliminate them. > > If having homosexuals in a family group helped survival rates, then > that gene trend would tend to get passed on. > > If having homosexuals in a family group hurt survival rates, then that > gene trend would tend to die out. > > The fact that is has not died out, and is probably genetic in nature, > shows that it is either inconclusive or masked by societal factors, > useful, or has been too short a time to see any trend. > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Get help! RoboHelp http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=58 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:180837 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
