I dunno about Sam and his "loony" responses......or if this is his point or not.....but I have a question.
How come Woodward's opinion was important when he spouted off against Bush, but suddenly aren't important when he's downplaying the Plame leak case....a case he apparently has a role in??? > > You so consistently misrepresent my point of view it's clear that > you've got some type of reading comprehension problem. This must also > contribute to your loony responses. I'll try it once more and then > I'm done: > > 1.) According the CIA Ms. Plame was an undercover agent. > > 2.) Somehow her name was leaked to the press by the administration. > This is confirmed by Mr. Woodward's revelation that he was the > original leakee. Put another way to make sure you get it, Mr. > Woodward is saying that the first leak of Ms. Plame's identity was to > him from an official other than Mr. Libby. That is, the Whitehouse > leaked the name of an undercover agent to the press. > > 3.) The Whitehouse denied that either Rove of Libby had anything to do > with the case. That is clearly a lie. Further, when Mr. McClellan > admitted as much, the Whitehouse actually changed the transcript of > what he said despite the fact that it was caught on video. > > Your assertion that "no crime was committed" is a complete denial of > the facts. If you have some reasonable point, make it, but 99% of the > time you don't. Your posts here continue that trend. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:182573 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
