You mean this? Some of the specialized but dual-use items being sought are, by all indications, bound for Iraq's missile program. Other cases are ambiguous, such as that of a planned magnet-production line whose suitability for centrifuge operations remains unknown. Some efforts involve non-controlled industrial material and equipmentincluding a variety of machine toolsand are troubling because they would help establish the infrastructure for a renewed nuclear program. But such efforts (which began well before the inspectors departed) are not clearly linked to a nuclear end-use. Finally, the claims of Iraqi pursuit of natural uranium in Africa are, in INR's assessment, highly dubious.
I haven't had any koolaid so I fail to see your point. You'll have to explain it to me. What I gave you was the first sentence of the first paragraph. You are trying to say that this is not the gist of the document? Dana On 11/17/05, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You left out the most important part of the very first paragraph of a > 70 odd page report: > (See INR alternative view at the end of these Key Judgments.) > It has a link :) > > On 11/17/05, Dana wrote: > > it's the second paragraph. The first one says: > > We *judge* that Iraq has continued its weapons of mass destruction (WMD) > > programs in defiance of UN resolutions and restrictions. Baghdad > > *has*chemical and biological weapons > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:182793 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
