That's what I was asking yesterday. My answer so far: not a thing as far as I can tell. Looked at some analyses last night and the fact that Woodward was also told tends to semi-support the contention that fuzzy memories and actually not knowing she was covert may be part of the problem. Beyond that... I can't see that it changes much. It opens the door to the possibility that there are further players, but the special prosecutor as much as said that already.
On 11/17/05, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So I 've read plenty on this Woodward thing and here's what I don't > understand: > > Mr. Woodward says he's "pushed" his source to allow him to release his > name, but the source refuses. Yet Mr. Woodward also says the source > told him about Ms. Plame in a casual "gossip" type manner and that > shortly thereafter he told fellow WP reporter Walter Pincus about Ms. > Plame, but Pincus denies this. > > So why would Mr. Woodward be protecting a source that delivered > information in such a casual way? Why didn't he pass this info along > waaaaayyy back when. If Mr. Woodward is so convinced there' s nothing > to this case, why not pass the info along especially given that he'd > already told Mr. Pincus what he knew? > > Something doesn't add up especially given Mr. Woodward's public > comments about the case. > > PS - here's about the best summary I've read on the matter: > > Early speculation on why Woodward's undisclosed source on Valerie > Plame's identity spilled the beans is that this is part of an effort > to exculpate Scooter Libby. I don't understand how that's supposed to > work. Libby stands accused of telling investigators that he first > heard Plame worked for the CIA from Tim Russert. Russert denies this, > as do several other reporters, as do several government officials who > say they discussed the matter with Libby. What's Woodward got to do > with it?" > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:182796 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
