> Dana wrote: > Despite where it is it is an AP story. So perhaps it is not Cheney. >
Just speculating, I don't think it's Cheney. However, Mr. Fitzgerald is asking for a 2nd Grand Jury, but it's hard to see how this plays for either side. It would seem like a negative and, personally, I think previous to the Woodward admission Mr. Fitzgerald had his sites set on Cheney. That was somewhat clear from his press conference and indictment. Where's he going now, I don't know. He could have renewed vigor for Cheney or he be heading in a totally different direction - starting from scratch. As for Libby I think it may be a net negative. While he can feel good that the 95% case against him fell to 65%, move investigation may bump it to 100% with new charges. Further, if his trial is pushed back past a new elections, and a Dem wins, he better start sweating. At that point I think you'd see a full deal from him. Finally, as for Mr. Woodward, I think PBS' WashingtonWeek got this right when the began a piece on him by showing his picture and saying, "What was this man thinking?" The journalists were equally critical of him. One of his colleagues saved a sliver of room for his career but, for me, his credibility is in the toilet. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:183230 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
