granted, but it is also at least partially responsible for the shift to heavier less fuel-efficient vehicles don't you think? In other words we didn't just get ranch trucks getting replaced by newer ranch trucks, we got Hummers as well.
Dana On 11/28/05, Kevin Graeme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's not dysfunctional if you see it as an incentive to replace > existing old heavy trucks that have MUCH poorer emissions controls. > Heck, when MN instituted manditory emissions checks, my old '80 Ford > didn't pass. > > On 11/27/05, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > but it isn't any kind of vehicle though... it's only vehicles over a > > certain weight. Not trying to give you a hard time, just pointing out > > that as policy goes this is a bit dysfunctional. > > > > Dana > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:184401 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
