driver 2 could have avoided the accident however if not for the obstruction there is no accident. That is what I mean by primary cause
On 11/28/05, Nick McClure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ah, see that is where we disagree, IMHO the cause of the accident was the > driver of car 2 failing to obey the law. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Dana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, November 28, 2005 4:32 PM > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: Re: Higher Taxes for Hybrids > > > > Legally car 2 is at fault in both scenarios. However in your scenario > > the primary cause of the accident is the obstruction in the road. > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Purchase Dreamweaver with Homesite Plus from House of Fusion, a Macromedia Authorized Affiliate and support the CF community. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=54 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:184444 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
