On 11/28/05, Michael Dinowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Most of the list archive content is already cleaned, threaded and saved to
> physical file for performance. There is actually very little actual code
> running on a per page basis. The main piece is a getPageContext().include()
> that loads in the generated HTML content. Very smooth, clean and tight.

You may not need Squid, but I think that you'd be suprised at the
speed improvement even on totally static .html files, not to mention
..cfm files that require processing time from CF.  You can avoid
spending CF threads and memory and free up more resources for "real"
CF requests.  Often, depending on how often the file is requested,
Squid will serve it straight from RAM, skipping the hard drive read
all together.

Many high traffic sites like CNN.com use Squid (or similar) cache
accellerators for static image files.  You can scale out with as many
Squids as you need while only keeping one CF (or other) source machine
in the background - making it a very cool scalability enhancer.

-Cameron

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble 
Ticket application

http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:184496
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to