I'd guess that if you are afraid to expain to a panel of judges that overwhelming approves such orders why a search is reasonable, odds are that it isn't.
On 12/21/05, Nick McClure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Isn't it? > > Reasonable is one of those words that can mean different things to > different > people. > > If congress passes a law allowing it, then wouldn't it fall into the > reasonable category until the Supreme Court orders it gone? > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Dana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 2:24 PM > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: Re: [politics] nobody else seems to be concerned > > > > oh man. So according to you it's just a bureaucratic checklist? > > > > On 12/21/05, Nick McClure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > The 4th Amendment doesn't claim that a warrant is needed to perform > the > > > search, only the means to obtain one. > > > > > > I would think that should congress pass a law allowing it, then the > > search > > > is in the eyes of the Constitution and the Supreme Court. > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:189302 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
