Gruss Gott wrote: > And ID is a valid perspective. IDers will argue that while it's not > testable, neither is the Big Bang. The difference between the two > that the Big Bang Theory was derived via math while ID was just > thought up.
Actually, the bigger difference is that the Big Bang theory is predictive. It has suggested things before they were ever discovered. A good example is black holes -- they were predicted long before we found all the indirect evidence of their existance. I think. My memory is a little fuzzy on this -- I've been reading more about quantum theory lately. :-) Anyway, ID is not predictive, because it can't tell us what the I might do before he/she/it/they do/does it. So it's neither repeatable nor predictive, which pretty much makes it scientifically untestable. --Ben ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Now thereâs a better way to fax. eFax makes it possible to use your existing email account to send and receive faxes. Try eFax free. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=63 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:189579 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
