Also, how can this legislature single out a single company for this?

At least, shouldn't it be for every company? 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nick McClure [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 12:38 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: [signs of sanity] MD no longer subsidizing Walmart
> 
> Is the company overtly taking advantage of this? Did they set 
> out to do this?
> 
> Or do they pay the same across the country and health care 
> costs more in MD so employees have to get additional coverage?
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Adam Haskell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 12:30 PM
> > To: CF-Community
> > Subject: Re: [signs of sanity] MD no longer subsidizing Walmart
> > 
> > exactly so you over looked the lack of health care benifits and 
> > possibly other things that a company SHOULD provide. You 
> are willing 
> > to make sacrafices I understand that anything is better 
> than nothing, 
> > but a company should nto take adavtage of this.
> > 
> > Adam
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:192310
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to