Well that's a positive at least.

Still don't think it's right.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sandra Clark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 1:19 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: [signs of sanity] MD no longer subsidizing Walmart
> 
> Actually, the legislature didn't single them out.
> 
> The bill states that any company with more than 10,000 
> employees in the state of MD shall spend at least 8% on 
> health benefits
> 
> It just so happens that all the companies with more than 
> 10,000 employees in MD do spend 8% or more on health benefits 
> with the exception of WalMart. 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tim Heald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 12:42 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: [signs of sanity] MD no longer subsidizing Walmart
> 
> Also, how can this legislature single out a single company for this?
> 
> At least, shouldn't it be for every company? 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:192324
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to