I'm trying to explain to you that they are wrong about that <g>.
>Governments bother because the amount of money they bring in is more >than the amount of money they give to wal-mart. > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: dana tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006 3:54 PM >> To: CF-Community >> Subject: Re: [signs of sanity] MD no longer subsidizing Walmart >> >> There's something called a clawback, where the corporation has to >refund >> part of the tax and asset incentives if it doesn't stay for a certain >> amount of time. They instituted them around here after getting burned >by >> Philips Semiconductor. And yes, there are of course other corporations >> that are not good neighbors -- Walmart is just a particualrly >egregious >> example, and offers such bad employment anyway that you ave to wonder >why >> governments bother. >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:192669 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
