I w2as looking at a broader set of social responsabilty as far as taking care of others. stealing, extoroting, abuse. You might have a point though....it still doesn't feel right...
Adam On 1/17/06, G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > My whole point was arguing this whole people who take a job voluntarily. > > Being at the bottum of the barrel is a shit load better than being > outside > > of the barrel. Walmart, and other companies, know this and I think they > > abuse this by offering very low wages and beifits. Great agrument that > hey > > they can get away with it and thats thier bussiness. Should governement > > get > > involved ell thats a matter of opinion. Me personally I'm on the fence > > here. > > In this case we're talking about a company that is not being, in my > > opinion, > > socially responsable and a company should be socially responsible. The > > governement has setup a long list of laws a rules to force the indivual > to > > be socially responsible. So while the government can force the > indivisual > > to > > be socially responible they should not/ can not force a company to be > > socially responsible? > > What laws? How is the government forcing me, personally, so be socially > responsible? I'm allowed to exploit people as much as I want. If i find > some > poor kid willing to mow my lawn for $1....i can exploit him! > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:192763 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
