I quite specifically said I wasn't following the thread, but just offered it up as a personal experience.
-----Original Message----- From: dana tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 9:23 PM To: CF-Community Subject: Re: [signs of sanity] MD no longer subsidizing Walmart ::shrug:: She has said she worked there and that it was ok. That's fine but that's not economics, which is not particularly concerned with the individual. It may be knowledge of WalMart but it's beside the point, which is the *economic* impact of Walmart on a *community*. I don't think that's a hateful statement. However, you are of course entitled to your opinion. Dana >You know that is a very hateful way to look at this. I would go so far >as to say that she has demonstrated the same amount of knowledge that >anybody else in this conversation has. > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: dana tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 9:57 PM >> To: CF-Community >> Subject: Re: [signs of sanity] MD no longer subsidizing Walmart >> >> whatever. You certainly haven't demonstrated any knowledge of the >topic so >> far. Resent away. >> >> >I resent that allegation. Just because I don't vent my opinions or >> >knowledge on CFCOMM does not mean in any way that I am not familiar >with >> >economic theory. Quite the contrary. >> >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:192895 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
