Currently I would say this should fall under state or local government. > -----Original Message----- > From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 8:59 AM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: [signs of sanity] MD no longer subsidizing Walmart > > You mean it isn't socially responsible for corporations not > to pollute the environment, and kill people as a result? > > Or that it is the government's role to intrude on the day to > day operations of corporations to control this corporate behavior? > > larry > > On 1/17/06, Nick McClure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > That is beyond social responsibility, and should be dealt with in a > > legal and standardized manner. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 5:28 PM > > > To: CF-Community > > > Subject: Re: [signs of sanity] MD no longer subsidizing Walmart > > > > > > If a free market is socially responsible then ecological > disasters > > > like Minamata Japan, Love Canal in the US, Bhopal India > etc., would > > > not have happened. > > > > > > larry > > > > > > > > > > > > >
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:192976 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
