Yeah, to an extent, I still think wal-mart has a good argument for equal
protection.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dana tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 1:05 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: States Rights: was(RE: [signs of sanity] MD no longer
> subsidizing Walmart)
> 
> let Maryland be Maryland, I say!
> 
> >You know that is one of the things that makes me not go around running
> and
> >screaming about this. It is the MD state legislature that passed it. I
> think
> >the law is flawed and unfair. I think there are better ways to do this.
> But
> >It isn't my state.
> >
> >In my state they are working for ways to allow people to work in union
> shops
> >without joining the union.
> 
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:193560
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to