logic vs testosterone ;) Know what I am saying? Dana
>Well, I wouldn't say that. I think there's a lot of merit to some of the >things he says. Take, for example, this quote: >"All I'm asking is that we give our returning soldiers what they need: >hospitals, pensions, mental health and a safe, immediate return." > >I can get behind that, or at the least, I can sympathize with the sentiment, >even if it is a little simplistic. > >I also understand the intent of the following statement: "But, please, no >parades." He's saying that effusive support for the troops can far too >easily come across as support for the war. > >What I can't get behind are statements like this: "The truth is that people >who pull triggers are ultimately responsible, whether they're following >orders or not." I'd argue that instead, we as citizens are all ultimately >responsible. We elected the leaders that made the decision to go to war. > > > >On 1/24/06, Kevin Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:194374 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
