logic vs testosterone ;) Know what I am saying?

Dana

>Well, I wouldn't say that. I think there's a lot of merit to some of the
>things he says. Take, for example, this quote:
>"All I'm asking is that we give our returning soldiers what they need:
>hospitals, pensions, mental health and a safe, immediate return."
>
>I can get behind that, or at the least, I can sympathize with the sentiment,
>even if it is a little simplistic.
>
>I also understand the intent of the following statement: "But, please, no
>parades." He's saying that effusive support for the troops can far too
>easily come across as support for the war.
>
>What I can't get behind are statements like this: "The truth is that people
>who pull triggers are ultimately responsible, whether they're following
>orders or not." I'd argue that instead, we as citizens are all ultimately
>responsible. We elected the leaders that made the decision to go to war.
>
>
>
>On 1/24/06, Kevin Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:194374
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to