that's obvious. the courts have been very clear on this since the early 1970's. To engage in domestic spying without a court warrent is a violation of the 4th amendment.
On 1/26/06, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't understand what you mean. > > On 1/26/06, Larry C. Lyons wrote: > > Interesting that you did include all he said, but the critical part is > > the phrase "under the law". > > > > Its clear that the administration seems to be ignoring that fact. > > > > larry > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:194541 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
