The critical phrase is Under the Law. What part of Under the Law do you not understand?
Do I have to put things in easily understandable monosyllables? By not getting a warrent, even a very slack retroactive FISA warrent, what the NSA under the Bush administration has done is violate the 4th admendment. The SCOTUS has been very firm about that. On 1/26/06, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 1/26/06, Larry C. Lyons wrote: > > that's obvious. > > Your sense of humor cracks me up. Ever do stand-up? > > > the courts have been very clear on this since the early 1970's. To > > engage in domestic spying without a court warrent is a violation of > > the 4th amendment. > > So you're saying Kennedy is wrong to say he can now do that under the > law? Or do you think under the law means it's below the laws and not > legal? > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:194552 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
