On 1/26/06, Larry C. Lyons wrote: > that's obvious. Your sense of humor cracks me up. Ever do stand-up?
> the courts have been very clear on this since the early 1970's. To > engage in domestic spying without a court warrent is a violation of > the 4th amendment. So you're saying Kennedy is wrong to say he can now do that under the law? Or do you think under the law means it's below the laws and not legal? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:194546 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
