http://www.theonion.com/content/node/37314

On 2/22/06, Michael Dinowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And as I said, a scholarly fight. I have history on my side and someone
> removed my edits because he says the source contradicts what I say. His
> source is controversial and is not know for historical accuracy, but it's
> the source used so the fight is on. This is the overwhelming weakness of
> wikipedia, acceptance of any source by any person and alteration of any
> information by any person for any reason. Doesn't say scholarship to me.
> Yeh, I'm pissed.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:197892
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to