Some of the earliest writings found also complained about exactly the same thing. Some things never change.
larry On 2/28/06, Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But the fact that the dude wrote it in the 1700s is pretty impressive > to me. Although the trend is fairly obvious to us now, I don't think, > at the time, it would have been considered common knowledge then. > > On 2/28/06, G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ok, I like your explanations much more than that obscure little blurb you > > first posted...a few comments..... > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:198276 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
