Tony, to me you are combining a whole bunch of things that don't neccessarily go together.
1. There is a sexual attractions to members of your own gender. 2. There is a sexual attractions to members of the opposite gender. 3. There is a lack of sexual attraction to members of your own gender. 4. There is a lack of sexual attraction to members of the opposite gender. 5. There is a lack of sexual attraction to anyone. 6. There is having sex with members of your own gender, not including intercourse. 7. There is having intercourse with members of your own gender (pun accepted) 8. There is having sex with members of the opposite gender. 9. There is having intercourse with members of the opposite gender. To me, the definition of "gay" is a person who is #1 and #4. It does not include actions, nor the ability to decorate. "Straight" people have sex with each other. Prison, sexual assault, the curious. (I get the willys just thinking about it, though) Gay people have sex with straight people. See Brokeback Mountain for details. (Or Tom Cruise? j/k) Bi people have sex with everybody. Baddum-bump. Gay people can decide to not have sex with anyone (Catholic priests? j/k) But the very fact that there ARE so many gay people has to mean something, doesn't it? On 3/13/06, Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hmmmm i dont know, jerry :) > its got to be an anomaly. how could it not be? > based on gear alone. the two just dont fit... hedonistically > its GREAT for those people, but WHOLLY worthless > for procreation, surviving and passing on genes, etc. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:199891 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
