Not really. Evolution is applied to groups as well, it may be to the group's advantage to have one or more gay members. Their genes are still passed along - it may not be their genes directly, rather their siblings etc. get passed along.
larry On 3/13/06, Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > but after all of this hullaballoo isnt odd, that men have this part, > and women have > this part, and they work well together. in the grand scheme of > things, doesnt that > seem to be the "right" way? not that i dont think there could be > mis-wirings mentally > that lead some in one direction vs. another, but when a huge portion > of the population > goes that way, and not the other way, and that same huge portion of > the population has > part "a" that goes with part "b", doesnt it make the "gay" way, a > little wrong, evolutionarily > speaking? > > if that were the case, and we all went that way, we would become > extinct. so, i just dont > get it. its weird, its not natural, and its not normal. > > tw > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:199843 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
