if her subjective evidence is to be taken at face value tw
On 3/14/06, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Jim wrote: > > I just don't see how that could be evolutionarily based: how could any > > genetic marker be triggered by the number of siblings? > > > > They all have the same mother! The mother's body/cells/eggs could > change with the more children she has thus affecting each additional > child while it's in the womb. > > On of the theories is that being Gay depends on the hormones the fetus > is exposed to. The mother's body may produce different/more/less > hormones as she has more children. > > Although that's got to be only one factor as there are twins who turn > out different. In the case of the article I posted the mother said > she noticed the difference in the boys at about 18 months. > > At a minimum that alone seems to prove that Gay is genetic, not upbringing. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:200015 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
