Which was later shown to be incorrect.

What you did not mention was that the only sites and papers still
playing up this right wingnut fantasy are sites like worldnet and
frontpage.

http://www.antiwrap.com/?945

Report Finds No Evidence Syria Hid Iraqi Arms

By Dana Priest
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, April 26, 2005; A01

U.S. investigators hunting for weapons of mass destruction in Iraq
have found no evidence that such material was moved to Syria for
safekeeping before the war, according to a final report of the
investigation released yesterday.

Although Syria helped Iraq evade U.N.-imposed sanctions by shipping
military and other products across its borders, the investigators
"found no senior policy, program, or intelligence officials who
admitted any direct knowledge of such movement of WMD." Because of the
insular nature of Saddam Hussein's government, however, the
investigators were "unable to rule out unofficial movement of limited
WMD-related materials."

The Iraq Survey Group's main findings -- that Hussein's Iraq did not
possess chemical and biological weapons and had only aspirations for a
nuclear program -- were made public in October in an interim report
covering nearly 1,000 pages. Yesterday's final report, published on
the Government Printing Office's Web site ( http://www.gpo.gov/ ),
incorporated those pages with minor editing and included 92 pages of
addenda that tied up loose ends on Syria and other topics.

U.S. officials have held out the possibility that Syria worked in
tandem with Hussein's government to hide weapons before the U.S.-led
invasion. The survey group said it followed up on reports that a
Syrian security officer had discussed collaboration with Iraq on
weapons, but it was unable to complete that investigation. But Iraqi
officials whom the group was able to interview "uniformly denied any
knowledge of residual WMD that could have been secreted to Syria," the
report said.

The report, which refuted many of the administration's principal
arguments for going to war in Iraq, marked the official end of a
two-year weapons hunt led most recently by former U.N. weapons
inspector Charles A. Duelfer. The team found that the 1991 Persian
Gulf War and subsequent U.N. sanctions had destroyed Iraq's illicit
weapons capabilities and that, for the most part, Hussein had not
tried to rebuild them. Iraq's ability to produce nuclear arms, which
the administration asserted was a grave and gathering threat that
required an immediate military response, had "progressively decayed"
since 1991. Investigators found no evidence of "concerted efforts to
restart the program."

Administration officials have emphasized that, while the survey group
uncovered no banned arms, it concluded that Hussein had not given up
the goal of someday acquiring them.

Hussein "retained the intent and capability and he intended to resume
full-scale WMD efforts once the U.N. sanctions were lifted," Pentagon
spokesman Bryan Whitman said yesterday. "Duelfer provides plenty of
rationale for why this country went to war in Iraq."

In one of the addenda released yesterday, investigators addressed the
risk that Iraqi scientists will share their knowledge or material with
other countries, particularly Syria and Iran, given previous contacts,
financial inducements and professional opportunities. The report
concluded that the risk exists but said "there is only very limited
reporting suggesting that this is actually taking place and no reports
that indicate scientists were recruited to work in a WMD program."

As for the possibility that insurgents in Iraq will draw on the
expertise of Iraqi scientists to develop unconventional weapons for
use against the United States and its coalition forces, the report
describes these efforts so far as being "limited and contained by
coalition action." The survey group was aware of only one scientist
assisting terrorists or insurgents. He helped them fashion chemical
mortar munitions.

The report found that missing equipment, however, "could contribute to
insurgent or terrorist production of chemical or biological agents."

In most cases the equipment appeared to have been randomly looted, but
in selected cases it appeared "to be taken away carefully," Duelfer
said in an interview yesterday. Overall, though, "it's like going to a
demolition derby for car parts," said Duelfer. The right equipment "is
hard to get."

Four military personnel assigned to the survey group's mission
perished in the violence that engulfed Iraq, and five others were
seriously wounded, in a mission that cost hundreds of millions of
dollars.

No further work is planned, although teams are on hand to be
dispatched when credible reports of weapons material are received in
Iraq. The report says, however, that continued reports of banned arms
in Iraq "are usually scams or misidentification of materials or
activities." It predicts that such reports will continue.

Although new information may be forthcoming, Duelfer said in an
accompanying letter that he has "confidence in the picture of events
and programs covered by this report."

"If there were to be a surprise in the future," he added, "it most
likely would be in the biological weapons area" because the size of
those facilities can be so small.

Duelfer also recommended that the United States release some of the
scientists and technocrats who are still being held captive in Iraq
strictly because of their work on Iraq's weapons programs dating back
to the Gulf War. "Many have been very cooperative and provided great
assistance in understanding the WMD programs" and Iraq's intentions,
and have exhausted their knowledge of these subjects, he wrote. "In my
view, certain detainees are overdue for release."

Of 300 individuals on a "blacklist" developed by U.S. military and
intelligence officials before the war, 105 have been detained. But the
list, said the report, was flawed. "Some very despicable individuals
who should have been listed were not, while many technocrats and even
opponents of the Saddam regime made the list and hence found
themselves either in jail or on the run."

The Pentagon's Whitman said that he was unaware of any scientists who
had been released recently because of Duelfer's appeal and that the
Defense Department routinely reviews detainees' status to see "whether
or not they are a threat to the coalition and Iraqi security forces
and whether or not they continue to have intelligence value."
(c) 2005 The Washington Post Company

On 3/17/06, Kevin Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here you go Larry
>
> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2004/01/25/wirq25.xml&sSheet=/news/2004/01/25/ixnewstop.html
>
> "David Kay, the former head of the coalition's hunt for Iraq's weapons
> of mass destruction, yesterday claimed that part of Saddam Hussein's
> secret weapons programme was hidden in Syria."
>
>
>
> Larry C. Lyons wrote:
> > So why not provide the citation for it. All over the news is nothing.
> >
> > On 3/17/06, Nick McClure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Citation? That was all over the news, Hell Bill Clinton mentioned it on
> >> David Letterman's show after the invasion.
> >>
> >> Dave asked about it, and Clinton said that there was still a lot of stuff
> >> that had never been accounted for, and while Saddam may have destroyed it 
> >> he
> >> had to prove they were gone.
> >>
> >>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 11:33 AM
> >>> To: CF-Community
> >>> Subject: Re: Saddam Pretended to have Weapons to prevent Attack
> >>>
> >>> citation for that please. I've heard a lot of people on this list
> >>> claim such but no one has provided data supporting that claim.
> >>>
> >>> Move and moved where for instance. People have been claiming that all
> >>> this stuff has been moved but no supporting evidence for that claim
> >>> has been advanced.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:200453
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to