> Nobody can prove one way or the other, as nobody was there to see it happen.
With evolution you don't need to have been there to see it to know that it happened. The _facts_ supporting evolution are provable and the experiments to test them are repeatable with little or no variation in the results. The science holds up to scientific testing and standards. Those hypothesis that don't are debunked and thrown out over time via rigorous testing and repeated experimentation. With ID, the arguments do not stand up to the rigors of testing. They do not meet the standards of science. period. -- will "If my life weren't funny, it would just be true; and that would just be unacceptable." - Carrie Fisher ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:201699 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
